Intellectual spirit of the reconstruction (1)

 New knowledge and intellectual class into the spirit of the united front reconstruction
South Wind reporter Yang Jun
Knowledge is power!
When Francis Bacon 400 years ago for the first time to say these words, this began an era, Therefore, Marx called him to the social sphere, problems prompted people to reflect.
2007, the look back over the years in China, has the power of knowledge to participate in national revival, the pursuit of personal worth and happiness of the track can go down in history, but when Geku .1978 years end of the year, the CPC Central Committee published
realistic background of this policy is that our country is the sixth generation of wealth creators through the baptism of the new market economy, intellectuals, and in the interests of the formation and differentiation of the transitional period, it is worth asking is what the knowledge to become kind of power? and knowledge how to become a force? how to get knowledge, to which the knowledge is gone; only in freedom and democracy of the modern civilization platform, knowledge, likely to become the power to promote social progress and regain its dignity, in terms of sense of social responsibility, the pursuit of knowledge of the independence of the hearts, or in the Justice in the comments and suggestions become the major source of building a harmonious society is one; I believe that most people are happy to see the editorial department
reconstruction .-- Intellectual Spirit
2006 At the end, the CPC Central Committee released realistic background, the current sixth-generation wealth creators in China is through the baptism of the new market economy, intellectuals, and with well-developed higher education and vocational education and popularization of new knowledge and the increasing number of these. most of them were born in the sixties and seventies of last century, they have high academic qualifications, desire and efforts to create wealth, and then gradually began to assert their own political aspirations.
irony is that, although the ruling indicates that new knowledge into the united front Rise, but over the past 100 years, Chinese intellectuals who are always excellent duty-bound to play a pioneering role in the spirit of comparison, in the various social conflicts breaking out today, including the new intelligentsia, including intellectual community Quezheng experienced an unprecedented challenge of the public.
When the term no longer has the intellectual and moral values, only to become a new knowledge level of wealth-based political description, it is natural that the mental reconstruction of intellectuals has become to face pressing issues.
intellectuals and political instincts
the CPC Central Committee in July 2006 held in the new century, the first made by the National United Front Work Conference interpretation, the train and bring up a strong representation and participation in politics government capacity requirements of Representatives outside the team, attracted much attention, Compared to other sectors, China's intellectuals seem to have a natural and instinctive and political ties, the power elite intellectuals have always wished for their own use. However, paradoxically, enthusiastic participation in politics and intellectuals often be seen is the most dangerous for the social groups.
1949 years later, a large number of edges in the outside of the system and institutional structure of intellectuals were included, the real participation in politics. At that time the voices of intellectuals. But look back 50 years ago, the summer of 1957, within just a few months the country's anti-rightist movement rapidly, the right of sudden change, 60 million intellectuals silence, intellectuals, political participation no longer have the enthusiasm of the early 1950s, the power spectrum is also rapidly becoming marginalized.
followed by several political movements and social catastrophe to further the was founded by intellectuals in the formation of cultural and social functions lost, a large number of exiled intellectuals, cultural and political fields in addition to how to deal with strong powers, once again intellectuals must carefully handle the issue.
1978 CPC Central Committee on Sept. 17 forward, Political Complex once again take hold. In fact, in the 1980s, almost all intellectuals through the Sound, which is following the May Fourth Movement in China after the emancipation of the second movement, the Chinese intellectuals of the Enlightenment were to play again and the role of critics.
At the same time, as the ruling party members in a higher proportion of intellectuals, and leaders of the Maoist decision-making in different ways, to the molecular structure of knowledge-based consulting groups and think tanks began to affect the major national decisions.
the economic rationality of intellectual
1992 speech, Deng Xiaoping's southern tour, the market's rapid economic development makes intellectuals following the end of the 1980s suffered another shock after the incident. the market economy of the 1980s Call of the Enlightenment ideal of intellectual one, but when it really comes, the enlightening self-sacrifice has become poor.
1990's economic take-off the social changes brought about, making the living situation and the intellectuals secularization of social dignity challenge. Mencius was very proud to say: said, ; the Heavy Body major changes, with a capacity of voice and thoughts of intellectuals rapid rise of attachment type, after following the economic elite, and has become another elite group - the elite. was originally expected to be the public interest advocate for the interests of intellectuals as the spokesman for the Group, the interests of workers and peasants been marginalized. . Although no lack of reasonable argument, much more was tied up on the interests of the Group expressed their suspicion.
in the late 1990s, the deepening of economic reform in China makes the shift in the political form of government to the elite in society or elite political forces represented absorb the political decision-making structures, the political elite, economic elite and intellectual elite began to form appears to some degree of collusion.
reform is the process of redistribution of social resources, and the current situation gradually involved in the elite interest groups, control and even dominate the direction of reform and programs for the low number of them, they already control most of the resources of society to become powerful interest groups. elite and ordinary people in the economic income, social status, etc. growing gap between the reform of the rules of the game from the 1980s gradually transformed into a multilateral win-win winner takes all of the zero-sum game, and is no longer a group of intellectuals of the Enlightenment in the 1980s who turned to become the vested interests.
become vested in the value of the intellectual level of absence, which means they can give up their pursuit of free will and thought, power and capital in the dual pressures and temptations to abandon the universal values and moral imperative.
zhao said that the greatest happiness in life, than in the most difficult time of transformation fortunes. This is buried deep intellectual heart of the complex. when intellectuals is bound to rise? It takes courage, conscience and system security and contribute to.
Moral Reconstruction and the institutional guarantee
. It is also where to find the moral goodness it? years, has entered the elite intellectuals, the early market economy is no longer apprehensive of being marginalized. With the reforms, as intellectuals, those with vested interests in obtaining a certain economic status and political status, have also made the right to speak on the reform path. All signs show that when the reform into difficult times, the rise of an ideology and culture are nurtured, and this, is in need of mental reconstruction of intellectuals.
in modern society, the experts government decision-making behind the think tank experts have expertise in the support. suffered a lot of intellectuals, political belief, political ideals, and reconstruction is in a crisis between the state. but how to deal with power, and how the face of the capital, intellectuals in the political instincts and how to get a balance between economic rationality, still a test of intellectual conscience.
since the mid-1990s, liberalism and New Left arguments have been carried out for 10 years, China some of the finest volumes in which the body of intellectuals, distortion and loss, is the most urgent proposition.
social change is often initiated by the intellectuals, any era, intellectuals are the backbone of society and the backbone. Today, when the rise of new knowledge class generally inevitable , talking about the mental reconstruction of intellectuals will not only point to a specific group of knowledge, in fact, it points to the spirit of our national reconstruction and social core values.
whether the institutional abuse of power and capital of the transverse to Statute? If this is not possible, looking forward to intellectual and moral self-discipline, can only be ridiculed Herzen as genius of the soil. Intellectuals spiritual renewal, requires appropriate soil system.
Guer, beginning in 2007, review the half-century ago, 14 January 1956 Zhou Enlai, the famous not meaningless:
operational research and work, should be promoted and carried forward the socialist construction in the academic discussion, it should make their creation and invention can be testing and promoting opportunities. Windshield Qin Hui recent years, of.
general history book about this concept that originated in the French Revolution, when the National Association of Members advocating radical change to sit in the left, conservative or not so radical to sit on the right, so there will be a said right itself means No, just talk about reform and conservative, I am afraid that can not be any problems, the key is what Paul, keep what, where so-called reform is to the change. Some people, as a confrontation between the radical and progressive, which, though significant, but compared to the speed, after all, or second place in terms of direction, we must first figure out which direction to enter, and then only the difference between radical and incremental.
but where progress toward not playing, what kind of can be demonstrated today. Perhaps it all comes from good intentions, thinking to safeguard deeper may not be aware of the difference.
altruism and self-interest is the difference between imaginary people now like to emphasize self-interest
altruism, goodness evil nature of difference. This distinction is sometimes said to appear is the a: human nature the other sense, or in the people and noble deeds, such as Lei Feng, Bethune and so on. In recent years, a popular leftist live drama to a banshee-like This sentence is a value judgments, these friends said that self-interest is bad, altruism is the interest of public good, should inhibit the former and the latter Yang. people should not just themselves, it should be for others, contributions to the overall interests, and so on.
these two critical completely to no avail. the fact that people should self-judgments and value judgments that really is the worship Jesus. and Jesus, and regardless of whether there are real people, at least believe he is a Christian in order to save humanity, was crucified at all on their own people. If Westerners should not worship Jesus, but should worship the Jews fishes - Judas for 30 pieces of silver to betray Jesus, is the typical selfish. were Christians, and its human source is universal in nature and not limited to a ; selfish ; Cultural Revolution even on the gallows, the stake column martyr. in the Middle Ages there is indeed a > two diametrically opposite, has a key premise that this is evil, and may be the greater evil! this is obvious: we generally think that does good voluntarily, then this is for good. but if someone pushes you the knife, I have something for you, is called charity. If you force me to put my knife to give you something, is called what? This is called robbery. robbery is not good? Of course not.
a large number of human history ; forced altruism, ;. This is not a , that is, those who are fully altruistic freedom. Without this freedom, Lee who did not help you, what is necessary to divide altruistic self-interest? from Prometheus, Jesus Christ, we used propaganda to Comrade Lei Feng, the name has a great good, because People believe that they are voluntary, not forced to make those choices. and some altruistic behavior, good and evil that people have different evaluation of the reason why is because their judgments are different from whom freedom, forced altruism evil Is it evil? generally the people also do not think so. otherwise difficult: for example I am a philanthropist, I certainly honorable, but people who accept my charity is not a bad man? Of course not. altruism under conditions of freedom is good and accept those who of course is in such good self-interest, but this is not evil, because he did not infringe the rights of others. But if the contrary, under conditions of freedom without a This person is forced to people as ; realism Free altruism is good, but not evil by those who benefit. Second, they force people to altruism evil Ren, who was not forced to do good. co speaking, Chong Shangli he ; right wing edge a mess. This friend then said: You see if the two sides are determined only altruism, not self-interest, then the society will quarreling, not a good thing.
another friend, said to be to argue that: you have problems logic. If buy low and sell produce conflicts can be resolved through bargaining. then the same will be sold at Guimai a conflict, why can not bargain to solve the problem? people can buy low and sell doing business, a deal, why people can not do fire sale Guimai sale, you can not deal? Why this does not work that altruism, egoism only feasible? This does not make sense!
I think He asked very good! his remark that: No matter that both parties are self-serving, or both were altruistic, will have a contradiction in logic. But there are contradictions does not matter, you can free consultation. not only the case of all selfish can be envisaged under the market economy, everyone is Lei Feng that we do not also practice market economy? that is Li Ruzhen speaks of human altruism is not likely, but not the logic of altruism and the market economy have any contradictions. purely logically, pure market economy br> strange is precisely: It was against the market economy today, at least against the Duola and so on. based on that Then another . that we used to always see a few people on the bus humility, another seat, this is a gentleman. But these people do not like to write as Li Ruzhen bickered, and soon became the seat let, well Well, there is no What contradictions.
Indeed, in general, the contradiction between freedom of altruism does not lead to freedom of conflicts caused by severe self-serving. The reason is very simple: Why seat rarely cause confusion? because you want to find an acceptable person to be that is not difficult, it will not quarrel over a little dispute will not be very intense. This shows that indeed the experience of altruism than self-interest on the vulnerable, at least between strangers is this: to find people who accept your seat, that is, willing to accept your even more strongly than the latter, that's nothing, like Li Ruzhen said, as free trade can solve the problem.
In other words, everything to do under the conditions of freedom: If someone wants to volunteer for others, and some voluntary self-interest, and are out of free will, it is a satisfaction of all of the ; normal country . However, the liberal argument does not seem to rely on this experience, regardless of market economy, democratic politics is not to ; in liberal can still be established. Not only that, as I also mentioned: I think that requires the efforts of idealism. The Socialist (that democratic socialism) is actually came from a difficult undertaking for the same reason.

self-serving platform to build a total of altruism, goodness Evil is not reasons. In this debate is probably the problem in the manufacture of fake. For civilization left and right are self-evident, it should be said to be a consensus. the market economy talk about The welfare state does not even wait for the statement as the premise. As for democracy and politics in modern civilization is actually a market economy and the welfare state, a common background, so send the total platform, of course, more is not .